Report: Former leader of Walz’s battalion criticizes governor’s military career.

The recent allegations of “stolen valor” against Minnesota Governor Tim Walz have sparked controversy and scrutiny regarding his military record. The battalion commander of Walz’s former Minnesota Army National Guard unit, John Kolb, issued a scathing message to Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate, shedding light on the issues surrounding Walz’s retirement and rank promotion.

Kolb, who served as a lieutenant colonel of the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery where Walz was a member, criticized Walz for retiring early, not completing the required coursework, and falsely claiming the rank of “retired Command Sergeant Major.” Despite Walz’s successful career as a Chief of Firing Battery/Gunnery Sergeant and First Sergeant, his rank was reduced to Master Sergeant after his retirement in 2005.

Walz’s campaign, promoted by the Harris camp, faced backlash for misleadingly portraying his military service. While Walz served honorably for 24 years with the Minnesota Army National Guard, his failure to complete the Sergeants Major Academy raises questions about his claim to the Command Sergeant Major rank.

Kolb’s social media post highlighted the discrepancy in Walz’s service record and emphasized the importance of integrity within the Noncommissioned Officer Corps. By tagging retired Command Sgt. Maj. Thomas Behrends, who succeeded Walz in the battalion, Kolb praised Behrends as a dedicated and competent leader who earned his title through sacrifice and service.

Behrends has been vocal about his concerns regarding Walz’s military career since Harris announced him as her running mate. The controversy surrounding Walz’s rank promotion and early retirement has elicited a response from various individuals, including Donald Trump Jr., who called attention to the issue of “stolen valor” and criticized the lack of media coverage.

As the debate over Walz’s military record intensifies, it raises broader questions about the importance of honesty and transparency in public service. The conflicting narratives surrounding Walz’s rank and retirement highlight the need for clarity and accountability in discussing one’s military background.

While Walz’s supporters continue to defend his actions and contributions to the military, the accusations of “stolen valor” underscore the significance of upholding the values and standards of the armed forces. As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how Walz and his campaign will address the allegations and clarify any misrepresentations in his military service.

Regardless of the outcome, the scrutiny surrounding Walz’s military record serves as a reminder of the responsibility public officials bear in accurately portraying their background and upholding the integrity of the positions they hold.