Senator Tom Cotton says if Trump were president, the Israel-Hamas war would likely be over by now.

Recent remarks made by Republican Senator Tom Cotton have sparked controversy regarding the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. According to Cotton, if former President Donald Trump were in office, the conflict would have likely been resolved by now.

During an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Cotton stated, “President Trump said just last night that he would absolutely provide Israel with the weapons they need to finish the job. This would have never happened on President Trump’s watch. And if he were president, this war would have probably already been over with much less civilian suffering in Gaza because he would have backed Israel to the hilt from the beginning.”

Senator Cotton’s comments come in the midst of a heated debate over President Biden’s handling of aid to Israel during the conflict. Last week, Cotton called for Biden’s impeachment over reports of delayed aid to Israel while facing pressure from a divided Democratic Party on the issue.

The recent $95 billion supplemental foreign aid package included approximately $26 billion for Israel, as well as humanitarian aid for areas affected by the conflict, such as Gaza. The Biden administration had proposed this aid nearly six months prior, but delays in its delivery have raised concerns among some lawmakers.

Cotton suggested that the delay in aid to Israel was politically motivated, pointing to Biden’s re-election bid as a possible factor influencing the decision. The senator’s strong stance in support of Israel reflects his consistent advocacy for the country’s interests in the face of external threats.

Senator Cotton has been a vocal critic of anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses as well. He recently called on the Biden administration to take action against foreign students participating in disruptive demonstrations against Israel, emphasizing the need to maintain a pro-Israel stance in educational environments.

In light of Senator Cotton’s comments, the debate over U.S. support for Israel and its implications for the ongoing conflict with Hamas continues to attract attention. The idea that President Trump would have handled the situation differently has raised questions about the current administration’s approach to the conflict and its impact on relations with key allies.

As the crisis in the Middle East unfolds, the role of the United States in mediating the conflict and providing support to its allies remains a topic of significant debate. The contrasting views of Senator Cotton and other lawmakers highlight the complex nature of U.S. foreign policy and the challenges of navigating international conflicts with competing interests at stake.

With the situation in Israel and Gaza showing no signs of immediate resolution, the statements made by Senator Cotton serve as a reminder of the ongoing political dynamics shaping U.S. involvement in the region. Whether President Trump’s approach would have led to a swifter resolution of the conflict remains a point of contention, underscoring the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.