Sources say Kristi Noem is unlikely to be chosen as Trump’s VP due to controversy over killing puppies.

After facing backlash over a controversial decision that involved her family’s pet puppy, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem may have jeopardized her standing as a potential vice-presidential candidate alongside former President Donald Trump.

Recently, Noem’s daughter, Kennedy, shared a video on social media showing the family’s new dog, a Boston terrier named “Reagan,” exhibiting aggressive behavior towards their other pets. In response, Noem made the difficult decision to euthanize the puppy, citing concerns for the safety of her family and other animals in the household.

However, the public reaction to the news was swift and overwhelmingly negative. Animal rights activists, as well as many pet owners and advocates, condemned Noem’s choice to put down the puppy instead of seeking alternative solutions such as training or rehabilitation.

As a result of the controversy, several anonymous sources close to Trump’s circle have indicated that Noem now has “no shot” at being selected as his running mate in a potential 2024 presidential campaign. While Noem has been a vocal supporter of Trump and his policies, the negative publicity surrounding the puppy-killing incident has tarnished her reputation among key Republican influencers.

Political analysts agree that Noem’s mishandling of the situation has significantly damaged her chances of being considered for the vice-presidential spot. Her perceived lack of empathy and poor judgment call into question her ability to handle high-pressure and sensitive situations on a national stage.

For Noem, the fallout from the puppy controversy serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of public perception and moral leadership. In the world of politics, any misstep, no matter how small, can have far-reaching consequences and impact one’s political career for years to come.

While Noem has not officially commented on the rumors regarding her vice-presidential prospects, the damage to her reputation may be irreparable. The incident has sparked a larger conversation about ethical decision-making and the responsibilities of public figures, especially those aspiring to hold the second-highest office in the land.

As the story continues to unfold, observers are left to ponder the implications of Noem’s actions and what they might mean for her future in politics. Will this controversy be a minor blip on the radar, or will it ultimately define her legacy in the eyes of the American electorate?

Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the image of Governor Noem and her ill-fated puppy will be a topic of discussion for weeks, if not months, to come.