Trump Organization criticizes New Jersey’s unfair liquor license obstacle following mogul’s conviction.
The Trump Organization’s liquor licenses in New Jersey have come under scrutiny following the state’s decision not to renew them in a timely manner. State officials cited former President Trump’s conviction in NY v. Trump as the reason behind their decision, pointing to a prohibition against individuals convicted of crimes involving “moral turpitude” from holding liquor licenses.
In response, a spokesperson for the Trump Organization emphasized that Trump does not personally hold any liquor licenses in New Jersey. They highlighted the impact of these licenses on many hard-working residents of the state, including bartenders, waitstaff, and event planners. The licenses are essential for hosting various events and contribute significantly to the state’s revenue.
Despite the absence of Trump’s name on the license documents, the state maintains that he still holds a direct beneficial interest in three New Jersey liquor licenses. The Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control has called for a hearing to determine the eligibility of the Trump Organization to hold these licenses, citing concerns about Trump’s conviction and its implications.
Trump Organization officials are required to appear before the Division in Trenton for a hearing to demonstrate their qualification for maintaining the licenses. The state has allowed beverage services at Trump properties in Bedminster and Colts Neck to continue operating under “ad interim” permits until the hearing date.
It should be noted that Trump’s conviction is not considered final until sentencing, which took place on July 11. The state of New Jersey is taking this matter seriously and ensuring that all necessary steps are taken to determine the future of the Trump Organization’s liquor licenses.
Overall, the situation highlights the complexities of liquor license regulations and the impact of legal convictions on business operations. The Trump Organization is facing challenges in New Jersey, and their response to the state’s concerns will likely shape the outcome of this licensing issue.
