Trump’s lawyer argues with host about former Biden official involved in New York hush-money case.

Former President Trump finds himself embroiled in a legal battle that has captivated the nation. His attorney, Will Scharf, has been vocal about the planned appeal of Trump’s criminal conviction, shedding light on what he sees as the weaponization of the U.S. legal system. Scharf, also a candidate for Missouri attorney general, appeared on ABC’s “This Week” to discuss Trump’s next steps after being convicted on 34 counts related to falsifying business records to hide payments to Stormy Daniels in a bid to influence the 2016 election.

Scharf didn’t shy away from criticizing the involvement of a former Department of Justice official under the Biden administration, alleging political motivations behind the prosecution led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The lawyer highlighted how prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, a former Biden DOJ official, seemingly played a key role in Trump’s case, fueling claims of political coordination.

The intense back-and-forth between Scharf and ABC host George Stephanopoulos underscored the contentious nature of Trump’s conviction. Scharf adamantly maintained that the legal proceedings had ties to President Biden and his allies, while Stephanopoulos vehemently refuted any such claims.

Despite the challenges ahead, Scharf remains unwavering in his defense of President Trump, dubbing the hush-money case as a “zombie case” suddenly resurrected to target Trump after he announced his bid for the presidency. The attorney vowed to pursue every possible avenue, including appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, to ensure Trump’s rights are upheld.

With the 2024 rematch between Trump and Biden looming and the implications of Trump’s guilty verdicts reverberating through the political landscape, the legal battle has taken center stage. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has called for an investigation into the alleged weaponization of the federal government against Trump, raising concerns about the politicization of the legal system.

The refusal of Judge Juan M. Merchan to recuse himself, coupled with Trump’s critique of the judiciary’s conduct, adds fuel to the fire. Scharf plans to challenge Merchan’s decisions and the jury instructions on appeal, citing due process violations and judicial errors that he believes tipped the scales against Trump.

As the legal drama unfolds, Trump’s right to speak out and challenge the proceedings remains a cornerstone of his defense. Scharf emphasizes that Trump’s candidacy for president grants him the constitutional right to address issues of public importance, including the alleged misconduct within the legal system.

Amidst the legal complexities and political undertones, the battle for Trump’s exoneration rages on, promising more twists and turns in the quest for justice.