What are Trump and Harris’ plans for climate change? Find out here.
As Election Day 2024 approaches, the climate change and energy policies of former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris remain shrouded in ambiguity. The differences in their views on climate change are stark, with Trump dismissing it as a hoax and prioritizing oil and gas production, while Harris acknowledges the climate crisis and advocates for a transition to a clean energy economy. Their campaign rhetoric and past actions provide some insight into what voters can expect from a potential Harris or Trump administration.
Trump has been vocal about his skepticism regarding climate change, labeling it a hoax and downplaying the potential impact of rising sea levels. He has championed increased oil and gas production, often proclaiming “drill, baby, drill” at campaign rallies. His administration opened up previously protected lands for drilling and took steps to boost LNG exports, emphasizing a preference for fossil fuels over renewable energy sources.
Harris, on the other hand, has consistently highlighted the dangers of climate change and the need for urgent action to mitigate its effects. She envisions a future where all Americans have access to clean air, clean water, and affordable energy. While not completely dismissing oil and gas, Harris has advocated for a shift towards a clean energy economy, although she has refrained from outright support for measures like banning fracking, given the delicate balance in key battleground states.
When it comes to specific climate policies, Trump has pledged to roll back parts of the Inflation Reduction Act and has been critical of initiatives like the Green New Deal. He has focused on expanding oil and gas production, reversing LNG export restrictions, and cutting funding for climate-focused agencies. His administration’s exit from the Paris climate agreement underscores his disregard for global climate commitments.
In contrast, Harris has supported the Inflation Reduction Act and has emphasized the need for emissions reductions and adherence to set standards. She has a history of holding big oil companies accountable through legal actions and investigations, signaling a willingness to address climate-related issues within the industry. However, her stance on specific measures like banning fracking has evolved over time, reflecting a pragmatic approach to energy policies.
As the 2024 election draws near, both candidates offer distinct visions for addressing climate change and energy policy. Trump’s focus on fossil fuel expansion and deregulation stands in contrast to Harris’ advocacy for a clean energy transition and climate accountability. Voters will need to consider these differences carefully as they evaluate the candidates’ platforms and potential impact on environmental issues.
